INTERPRETING THE COUNCIL: ARCHBISHOP MANNING AND THE VATICAN DECREES CONTROVERSY

Jeffrey P. von Arx

INTERPRETING THE COUNCIL: ARCHBISHOP MANNING AND THE VATICAN DECREES CONTROVERSY

Fairfield University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Examines the attitudes of William Ewart Gladstone to the doctrine of papal infallibility propounded at the Vatican Council and the responses of John Henry Newman and Henry Edward Manning, who opposed the more extreme ultramontane interpretations of that doctrine. Manning was concerned with dispelling Gladstone's fear that the doctrine might undermine the civil allegiance of English Catholics.

Original language	American English
Journal	Recusant History
Volume	26
State	Published - May 1 2002

Disciplines

Arts and Humanities
History

Access to Document

INTERPRETING THE COUNCIL ARCHBISHOP MANNING AND THE VATICAN DECRFinal published version, 2.53 MBLicense: CC BY

Cite this

@article{97656f457ac94c169ff8288dfa2c9dac,

title = "INTERPRETING THE COUNCIL: ARCHBISHOP MANNING AND THE VATICAN DECREES CONTROVERSY",

abstract = " Examines the attitudes of William Ewart Gladstone to the doctrine of papal infallibility propounded at the Vatican Council and the responses of John Henry Newman and Henry Edward Manning, who opposed the more extreme ultramontane interpretations of that doctrine. Manning was concerned with dispelling Gladstone's fear that the doctrine might undermine the civil allegiance of English Catholics.",

author = "\{von Arx\}, \{Jeffrey P.\}",

year = "2002",

month = may,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

volume = "26",

journal = "Recusant History",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - INTERPRETING THE COUNCIL: ARCHBISHOP MANNING AND THE VATICAN DECREES CONTROVERSY

AU - von Arx, Jeffrey P.

PY - 2002/5/1

Y1 - 2002/5/1

N2 - Examines the attitudes of William Ewart Gladstone to the doctrine of papal infallibility propounded at the Vatican Council and the responses of John Henry Newman and Henry Edward Manning, who opposed the more extreme ultramontane interpretations of that doctrine. Manning was concerned with dispelling Gladstone's fear that the doctrine might undermine the civil allegiance of English Catholics.

AB - Examines the attitudes of William Ewart Gladstone to the doctrine of papal infallibility propounded at the Vatican Council and the responses of John Henry Newman and Henry Edward Manning, who opposed the more extreme ultramontane interpretations of that doctrine. Manning was concerned with dispelling Gladstone's fear that the doctrine might undermine the civil allegiance of English Catholics.

UR - https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/history-facultypubs/35

M3 - Article

VL - 26

JO - Recusant History

JF - Recusant History

ER -

INTERPRETING THE COUNCIL: ARCHBISHOP MANNING AND THE VATICAN DECREES CONTROVERSY

Abstract

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this