Abstract
Pomeranz's study "The Great Divergence" is a major contribution in historical social science insofar as it informs us why Europe and China experienced different trajectories of socio-economic development during the Early Modern period. What is unfortunately lacking is an assessment to what extent the diverging path dependencies of these two historical systems were to a certain extent already determined in the preceding period, c. 1200-1500 CE. In comparing the different social structures within the political economy of Europe and China during this "medieval" period, the author attempts to shed a new light on the "transition" debate which has remained insufficiently explored in Pomeranz's otherwise excellent and thought-provoking book.
[A substantially revised version of this article was translated into Korean and published as “Yurupkua Chunggukae Bikyosa” [Europe and China’s Comparison] in Changjak-kwa-Bipyong (Creation & Criticism, a peer reviewed South Korean journal), Korea: Changbi Publishers, May 2003, p. 302-320.]
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Review of the Fernand Braudel Center |
| Volume | 25 |
| State | Published - Oct 1 2002 |
Disciplines
- Anthropology
- Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Sociology
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS