TY - JOUR
T1 - Development, Implementation and Evaluation of a Peer Review of Teaching (PRoT) Initiative in Nursing Education
AU - Mager, Diana
AU - Kazer, Meredith Wallace
AU - Conelius, Jaclyn
AU - Shea, Joyce M.
AU - Lippman, Doris T.
AU - Torosyan, Roben
AU - Nantz, Kathryn
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - For many years, an area of research in higher education has been emerging around the development and implementation of fair and effective peer evaluation programs. Recently, a new body of knowledge has developed regarding the development and implementation of fair and effective peer evaluation programs resulting in formative and summative evaluations. The purpose of this article is to describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of a peer review of teaching (PRoT) program for nursing faculty, initiated at one small comprehensive university in the northeastern United States. Pairs of nursing faculty evaluated each other’s teaching, syllabi, and course materials after collaborating in a pre-evaluation conference to discuss goals of the classroom visit. Qualitative data gathered in post project focus groups revealed that faculty found their modified PRoT process to be a mutually beneficial experience that was more useful, flexible and collegial, and less stressful than their previous evaluation process.
AB - For many years, an area of research in higher education has been emerging around the development and implementation of fair and effective peer evaluation programs. Recently, a new body of knowledge has developed regarding the development and implementation of fair and effective peer evaluation programs resulting in formative and summative evaluations. The purpose of this article is to describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of a peer review of teaching (PRoT) program for nursing faculty, initiated at one small comprehensive university in the northeastern United States. Pairs of nursing faculty evaluated each other’s teaching, syllabi, and course materials after collaborating in a pre-evaluation conference to discuss goals of the classroom visit. Qualitative data gathered in post project focus groups revealed that faculty found their modified PRoT process to be a mutually beneficial experience that was more useful, flexible and collegial, and less stressful than their previous evaluation process.
UR - https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/nursing-facultypubs/58
U2 - 10.1515/ijnes-2013-0019
DO - 10.1515/ijnes-2013-0019
M3 - Article
VL - 11
JO - International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship
JF - International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship
ER -